<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many social media managers does it take to run a Twitter profile?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://eatsleepsocial.com/2011/01/how-many-social-media-managers-does-it-take-to-run-a-twitter-profile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://eatsleepsocial.com/2011/01/how-many-social-media-managers-does-it-take-to-run-a-twitter-profile/</link>
	<description>making sense of social</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>https://eatsleepsocial.com/2011/01/how-many-social-media-managers-does-it-take-to-run-a-twitter-profile/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatsleepsocial.com/?p=15984#comment-1567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You also have brands, especially I&#039;ve seen a lot in high tech where bloggers are plentiful, where the number of personal twitter accounts far outweight the number of brand accounts. I think that&#039;s kind of the first question to answer: centralize or decentralize. Both models have their + and -.  The problem I see with centralized is that it&#039;s just not social. If you have 20 people interacting with 2000 through one account, why not have them interact with 100 each through their own account (x20)?

Laurent]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also have brands, especially I&#8217;ve seen a lot in high tech where bloggers are plentiful, where the number of personal twitter accounts far outweight the number of brand accounts. I think that&#8217;s kind of the first question to answer: centralize or decentralize. Both models have their + and -.  The problem I see with centralized is that it&#8217;s just not social. If you have 20 people interacting with 2000 through one account, why not have them interact with 100 each through their own account (x20)?</p>
<p>Laurent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How many social media managers does it take to run a Twitter profile? &#124; Eat Sleep Social – Mike Phillips -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>https://eatsleepsocial.com/2011/01/how-many-social-media-managers-does-it-take-to-run-a-twitter-profile/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention How many social media managers does it take to run a Twitter profile? &#124; Eat Sleep Social – Mike Phillips -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatsleepsocial.com/?p=15984#comment-1537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Roy Wells, Fredrik Bergljung and Mike Phillips, Mei Ying. Mei Ying said: How many managers do u need to manage ur brand&#039;s twitter profile? http://goo.gl/uorRZ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Roy Wells, Fredrik Bergljung and Mike Phillips, Mei Ying. Mei Ying said: How many managers do u need to manage ur brand&#039;s twitter profile? <a href="http://goo.gl/uorRZ" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/uorRZ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
