making sense of social
googleplus
6 comments

Do you really want a Google+ page for your brand?

Google+ launched brand pages yesterday to some fanfare and it seems that once more people are hailing it as the next big thing, the Facebook killer. Even people who were but yesterday decrying the death of the social networking site, scoffing at the 50 million users as inactive and essentially calling Google plus dead in the water, another failed Google project. Funny how fickle the social media expert crowd is when shiny new features are involved.

Brands can now create brand pages for their brands. Great. Whilst marketers are now having crisis meetings with clients who demanding to know whether they should create a Google plus page and how it fits into their social media strategy (surely they’re not just creating accounts for the sake of it?), most people are probably thinking, awesome, more companies in my stream.

So what should your brand be doing on Google plus?

If you are struggling to answer that question then perhaps the answer us nothing. And that’s a perfectly acceptable answer.

If you still want to something, like a child with a shiny new toy, then stop and think. Answer some questions:

  • Do you have a Facebook and Twitter page?
  • Do they have a large fan base?
  • Is my audience on Google+? Will they be?
  • Do you have enough budget for another channel?
  • If you start maintaining a Google plus page, what resources will you have to take away from Facebook, Twitter etc? Time, money, content? How will that affect the users on those channels?
  • What can you do on Google plus that you can’t do elsewhere?
  • What are you going to use Google plus for long term?

Gimmicks make for quick growth, but once the novelty wears off, if there isn’t a sustainable approach to content you’ll be left with a dead page, and no one likes that.

That’s not to say no one should be creating brand pages on Google, the different feature set should allow some innovative new marketing opportunities for the early adopting brands. Hangouts for example allow for countless opportunities for brand with celebrity endorsements. Pop up gigs for fans, crowd sourced interview etc. And there is certainly some value in the idea that people can over think the strategy, spending weeks and months making a decision. If you can do something awesome and are confident you can follow it up with continued awesome, then a certain line of thinking says do it. Fortune does favour the bold. But make sure it really is awesome. And recognise that you’re not just doing a one off launch stunt. You’re creating a page. A page you’ll have to maintain for the foreseeable future. A Google plus page isn’t just for launch day.

The last question you need to ask is Do you really want a Google plus page for your brand?

Let me know what you think, show off your Google+ brand pages in the comments. And follow me on Google+ here


share:

About the author

This post was written by Mike Phillips

Plannery type person with silly side projects. Not to be trusted.

Follow them on twitter: @imjustmike

Mailing list sign-up


View previous campaigns.

6 Comments

  1. Nicholas Gill |

    +
    Is my audience there?
    Or
    Could they be if what we do is valuable to them?
    Or
    Do you have an innovation budget/work stream to pilot and understand these things?

    Reply
    • Mike Phillips |

      Good points as usual Mr Gill. Especially the audience question, missed that one.

      Reply
  2. Edward Homes |

    Well given that while I was logging on to make this comment Twitter was over capacity, it seems there may be room ….

    … my original comment, given the average number of brands people are engaged with in Facebook, isn’t there most important questions still what and how rather than where?

    e:)

    Reply
    • Mike Phillips |

      Ha good point on Twitter being down!

      I’m not personally convinced about the levels of engagement on Facebook. I think a lot of brands are in the space, but they’ve bastardised the word engagement. Almost all are just using the channel to broadcast their message. That’s not engaging at all. Google+ has new features that really do encourage more of a dialogue. It’s also not a space explicitly for friends. I don’t want to “engage” with brands on Facebook because that’s where I talk to my friends. I am open to following them on Twitter and G+ because, well, I don’t care as much about who I follow their. It’s less of a private space.

      Reply
  3. Anna Haire |

    I’ve been asking myself this same question. Our company doesn’t have a facebook page, nor do I think that’s where my audience is and I totally agree on not wanting to put my company’s brand out there when it’s where I think most people go to to engage with friends. However, I do think more of my target audience fits the Google+ demographics, what I wonder about is the activity level. How much engagement is there really going on in Google+? I want more dialogue and less “spewing.” Any B2B brands doing a really good job of his on Google+?

    Reply

Leave A Comment